Euthanasia Essay - Artificial Life or Natural Death? :: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide

Artificial Life or Natural Death?         Euthanasia has been a hotly debated about topic for the away couple of decades, but has recently been thrust into the limelight by some(prenominal) controversial court and hospital decisions.         Euthanasia is defined as the mercy kill of a person who is brain dead, terminally ill or otherwise at expirys door. This usually, but not necessarily, affects people who are are separated from death only by machines. Whether you personally believe mercy killing is a viable solution in a hopeless built in bed or not the proponents for both sides provide arguments that can be quite convincing. Supporters of euthanasia say that it is such an improbability for a miraculous recovery and a return to a normal life that it is not worth putting the patient through all the suffering and agony that prolonging their life would cause or the fortune of hospital bills that you would pay. The opposit ion feels that it is not right for people to abandon other members of the human race because there is always a chance, even though it is a weensy one, that they will regain all functons and return to a normal life.         There are many cases in which euthanasia is acceptable. Brain death is one situation which merits euthanasia. It is also one of the more common cases where euthanasia is requested. Brain death is when all brain activities cease.         The lines are fairly well drawn in the natural law about patients who are suffering but are still compotent, but when the law is asked to determine the fate of a lingering, comatose, incompotent patient the lines begin to blur. In many cases the courts turned to the patients family, but what if there are not any or they disagree?  In such cases who decides? In a controversial decision a Massachusetts court allowed that it would invoke its own substitute judgement on b ehalf of a mentally ill woman. In a second case mentioned in the January 7 issue of Newsweek, a Minnesota Surpreme court turned to three hospital ethics committees to review a dying loners case, followed their collected wisdom and tell him off the respirator so that he could have a dignified death.  It is